I am facinated by this article from the Wausau Daily Herald (Wisconsin) and the question it raises. In order to save money, a library director is saying that today's librarians do "less complex work." They are reorganizing and cutting the librarians' salary by $10,000 (I am assuming this means each, but looking at the article it is not clear). I want to know more about a library director who would willingly make such a claim publicly (does she even have an MLS?), and I will ask my older collegues what they think about this question. As I am at an academic library, so it is a different environment. I will admit I am very grateful to have computer databases instead of print indexes and I could see collection development having been much more difficult without the computer tools todays vendors provide. However, modern libraries are evolving so quickly. Keeping up with technology and its surrounding trends seems to be half of what I do.
I see patrons of the past valuing the library more than current users do (public and academic), but perhaps this is just an assumption. I can't help feeling like American society was much smarter 40 years ago than it is now. But as I am only in my 20s, my personal experience on any of this is very limited!
Friday, February 22, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
"Less complex work"?? I can't say that's true at my academic library, either. Serials work has certainly become more complex. Electronic resource management requires support staff to gain what some consider to be professional-level skills.
What a disappointing article.
Mary:
Thanks for this lead. I posted your link at my blog. http://kmlisc.blogspot.com/2008/02/researching-with-wikipedia-experiences.html
Re: your inquiry about an academic lib blogs for a small library, see my other post for a list, http://lit2542006.blogspot.com/2008/02/library-20-based-and-debased.html
Post a Comment